Liquid syntax error (snippets/seo-jsonld line 46): Variable '{{ shop.url | append: routes.search_url | append: '?q={search_term_string}' was not properly terminated with regexp: /\}\}/ Skip to content

Free Express shipping over $300 · Ships from CanadaFree Express over $300

Horizon® Peptides

ChemistryGuide

Solid-phase peptide synthesis: how a peptide is built, one residue at a time

Most peptides made today are manufactured by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS).1 The chain is grown one amino acid at a time while its first residue stays attached to a solid support.2 This guide follows the modern Fmoc version of that cycle from resin to freeze-dried powder and shows where each family of impurity comes from. It describes the chemistry in general, and is not an account of how any batch on this site was made.

  • Horizon Peptides editorial
  • Updated
  • 12 min read
  • 16 sources

Evidence cited on this page

  • 8 reviews
  • 6 chemistry studies
  • 2 other sources
On this page9 sections

Key points

  • SPPS keeps the growing chain on a solid polymer, so leftover reagents are washed away by filtration and no intermediate has to be isolated.2
  • Chemistry study In Fmoc chemistry a mild base removes the temporary Fmoc group, and acid frees the finished chain and its side chains at the end.34
  • The chain is built by repeated cycles of deprotection, washing, coupling and capping.5
  • Review Inefficient steps leave chains with residues missing, and side reactions add racemized, adduct-bearing and oxidized forms.1
  • The crude product is a complex mixture: it is purified by chromatography and then commonly freeze-dried.5
  • Review Sequences whose chains aggregate during synthesis, the “difficult peptides”, are harder to make.6

Merrifield’s idea: keep the chain on a solid support

A peptide bond forms when the carboxyl group of one amino acid reacts with the amino group of another.2 To make the bonds in a chosen order, the groups that should not react are blocked with protecting groups, and one is unblocked each time an amino acid is added.2 In the conventional method the product had to be separated from by-products and unreacted material after every step, and some was lost each time.2 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences put a number on the problem: a hundred steps at 90 per cent each would leave 0.003 per cent of the material.2

Bruce Merrifield’s answer was to attach the first amino acid, through its carboxyl group, to a solid polymer.2 After each reaction the by-products and leftover starting materials are removed by filtering and washing the polymer, and the peptide is taken off only when the whole chain is finished.2 The Academy credited the method with step yields of 99.5 per cent or better and noted that it suits automation; Merrifield received the 1984 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for it.2

Two consequences follow.

  • The chain grows backwards. The first residue is held through its carboxyl group,2 so it becomes the C-terminal end and the chain is extended toward the N-terminus. Sequences are written the other way round, as the article on peptide nomenclature and modifications explains.
  • Nothing is purified until the end. A peptide bound to the resin cannot be tested without chemically changing it, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) describes the crude material that comes off as relatively complex.5 Chains that went wrong along the way come off with the product.

The Fmoc strategy: two kinds of protecting group

Each amino acid going into the chain is protected at its amino group and, where relevant, on its side chain.5 The first protection comes off at every cycle and the second has to stay until the end, so one must be removable without touching the other.

Chemistry study Chang and Meienhofer showed in 1978 how to do that with the Fmoc group (9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl), which a mild base, piperidine, removed completely.3 That allowed the side chains to carry tert-butyl-type groups and the peptide to be joined to the resin by a link that mild acid breaks.3 The authors pointed out that this avoided side reactions of the method then in use, which removed its temporary group with acid at every cycle and freed the peptide with hydrogen fluoride.3

Review A 1990 review by Fields and Noble called Fmoc synthesis a truly “orthogonal” scheme.7 The word describes protecting groups that come off under unrelated conditions, here base for Fmoc and acid for the side chains.3 A 2016 review, two of whose three authors were at Merck’s Novabiochem unit, describes Fmoc SPPS as the method of choice and says that high-quality building blocks are inexpensive because therapeutic peptides are made on a multi-tonne scale.8

The cycle, step by step

One cycle of solid-phase peptide synthesis A circle of four steps. The peptide chain is anchored to a resin bead. Step 1, deprotect: the protecting group on the end of the chain is removed. Step 2, wash. Step 3, couple: the next protected amino acid is joined to the chain. Step 4, wash. Each turn of the cycle adds one amino acid. After the last turn the chain is cut from the resin and purified. 1 Deprotect 2 Wash 3 Couple 4 Wash One turn adds one amino acid The chain is anchored to a resin bead and grows one residue at a time. 1 uncaps the end of the chain; 3 joins the next amino acid to it. After the last turn the chain is cut from the resin and purified.
The solid-phase synthesis cycle: deprotect, wash, couple and repeat, then cleave

The EMA’s guideline on synthetic peptides, in effect since 1 June 2026, summarizes the assembly as repeated cycles of deprotection, washing, coupling and capping on a solid support, followed by a final cleavage step.5

1. Resin and linker

The resin is the solid support, and the first amino acid is joined to it through a linker.5 The EMA lists swelling volume, mesh size and loading among the typical quality attributes of a resin.5

Review A methods chapter on Fmoc synthesis calls the choice of resin and linker a key parameter for success.9 It surveys the resins and linkers used to make peptides that end in a C-terminal amide or a carboxylic acid.9

2. Deprotection

Chemistry study Piperidine removes the Fmoc group, which frees the amino group of the last residue added for the next coupling.3 The resin is then washed.5

3. Coupling

The next protected amino acid reacts through its carboxyl group with the free amino group on the resin, and a new peptide bond forms.2 The EMA guideline notes that additives used in the process suppress epimerization, the flipping of a residue into its mirror-image form.5

Chemistry study A 2009 study tested one such additive, Oxyma, in peptide-bond formation by the carbodiimide method and reported a strong capacity to inhibit racemization, with coupling efficiency above that of the older additive HOBt.10

4. Checking, recoupling and capping

The most common in-process check is the Kaiser test, a colour test based on the reaction of ninhydrin with primary amines.5 An incomplete coupling is often repeated, and sites that still have not reacted are capped by acetylation so that they cannot grow further.5

5. Cleavage

Chemistry study At the end, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) releases the peptide from the resin and strips the side-chain groups.4 King and colleagues noted that the protecting groups and linkers set free can modify tryptophan, tyrosine, methionine and cysteine.4 They compared scavengers, chemicals added to suppress those side reactions, found one mixture the most efficient against a wide range of them, and used it in making ten peptides of 20 to 50 residues.4

6. Purification

The EMA guideline states that synthetic peptides are generally purified by chromatography, and that the target is not always fully separated from closely related impurities that elute near it.5 Manufacturers therefore collect fractions, pool the purest, and may purify the side fractions again.5

Review Mant and colleagues review the main modes of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) used for peptides, which are size-exclusion, ion-exchange and reversed-phase, and give preparative reversed-phase protocols.11

The guide to analytical methods for peptides covers the same technique at analytical scale.

7. Isolation

Lyophilization (freeze-drying) is common practice for isolating the purified peptide, with precipitation, crystallization and spray drying as alternatives.5 The powder often carries a counter-ion: the guideline says acetate is the usual one, that trifluoroacetate or chloride are also possible, and that the type of counter-ion can affect a peptide’s biological and physicochemical properties.5 The drying step has its own guide: why peptides are lyophilized.

Where impurities come from

The table lists the main peptide-related impurities and the step each comes from.

Impurity How it arises How it differs from the target
Deletion sequence A coupling or a deprotection is incomplete, and the chain carries on at a later cycle5 One or more residues missing
Truncated sequence An unreacted chain is capped with an acetyl group and stops growing5 Shorter, with an acetylated end
Insertion sequence The same amino acid is coupled more than once in one step5 One extra residue
Epimer One residue changes from the L to the D form, or the wrong form was in the building block5 Same atoms and mass, different shape
Diketopiperazine loss Two residues leave the chain together as a small ring12 Two residues missing
Aspartimide products An aspartic acid residue closes into a cyclic imide513 Aspartic acid can then racemize
Protecting-group adducts A side-chain group is not removed, or a released fragment attaches to a sensitive residue14 Heavier than the target
Oxidized and joined forms Side chains oxidize, or chains link into dimers and oligomers1 Added oxygen, or two or more chains

Missing residues: deletion and truncation

Both kinds lack residues, in different ways. A capped chain stops where it failed and is left as an acetylated fragment, while a chain that only missed a step keeps growing and can end up a single residue short.5

Chemistry study A 2015 quality study from Ghent University evaluated a set of quorum-sensing peptides supplied for research with a requested purity of at least 95 per cent.14 In the authors’ own testing only 44 per cent met that figure, most of the related impurities lacked one or more amino acids, and the main compound in one sample had a different structure from the peptide wanted.14

Racemization

Every natural amino acid except glycine has at least one stereocentre, so a residue can flip into its mirror-image form and give a stereoisomer of the target.5 A stereoisomer that differs at one centre only is called an epimer. The EMA guideline notes that building blocks with urethane-type protecting groups such as Fmoc are rather resistant to the ring formation that leads to this change.5

Chemistry study In a study from CEM Corporation, a model 20-residue peptide containing all twenty natural amino acids was assembled with microwave heating: cysteine, histidine and aspartic acid were susceptible to racemization, and a lower coupling temperature limited it for histidine and cysteine.13

Review A 2023 review notes that epimerized products have very similar physical characteristics, which makes them difficult to purify, and that the change can alter a peptide’s bioactivity.15

Rings that should not form

Chemistry study The same microwave study found that aspartimide formation, and the racemization of aspartic acid that follows it, fell when an additive was put in the deprotection solution or its base was changed.13

Chemistry study A 2022 study from Eli Lilly examined diketopiperazine formation during the solid-phase synthesis of tirzepatide.12 The side reaction gave impurities with two amino acids missing.12 It occurred mainly during Fmoc removal and while a resin-bound intermediate was held after coupling, and intermediates with proline as the second residue from the growing end were prone to it.12 Replacing Fmoc with another temporary protecting group eliminated the by-products, and an additive and a lower storage temperature made the intermediates markedly more stable.12

Adducts, oxidation and stray peptides

Review A review of impurities in peptide medicines lists three more groups: adducts left by incomplete removal of side-chain groups, oxidized side chains, and dimers or larger oligomers.1 It also notes that trifluoroacetate can reach the final product as a counter-ion, and records cases of contamination with an unrelated peptide, which the authors attribute to a lack of appropriate manufacturing practice.1

Why long and difficult sequences are harder

Yields multiply. If every cycle delivers the same share of correct chains, the share that is full length at the end is that figure raised to the number of cycles. The table is arithmetic, not measurement.

Average yield per cycle After 10 cycles After 20 cycles After 30 cycles After 40 cycles
97% 74% 54% 40% 30%
99% 90% 82% 74% 67%
99.5% 95% 90% 86% 82%

What is not full length still resembles the target, and such closely related impurities are the ones chromatography does not always separate completely.5

Review A 2016 review defines “difficult peptides”, a term from the 1980s, as sequences whose chains form beta-sheet contacts strong enough to aggregate during synthesis, held together by hydrogen bonds along the backbone.6 The EMA guideline names special building blocks used against such problems: pseudoproline dipeptides and a modified glycine, Dmb-glycine, to limit aggregation, and other dipeptides to reduce diketopiperazine formation.5

Review A 2019 perspective by chemists from eight pharmaceutical companies describes current peptide synthesis as relying on large amounts of highly hazardous reagents and solvents.16 The EMA guideline notes that the solid-phase process requires extensive washing of the resin.5

Manufacturers may also make fragments on resin and join them in solution, a hybrid approach that the EMA says may become more popular for large-scale production.5 What these factors do to a price is the subject of why peptide prices vary.

Reading a purity figure with the synthesis in mind

For peptides used as active substances in medicines, the EMA guideline cites the European Pharmacopoeia: peptide-related impurities are reported above 0.1 per cent, identified above 0.5 per cent and qualified above 1.0 per cent.5 Those thresholds are for substances used in medicines, not a description of research materials, on this site or anywhere else.

The synthesis also shows what a purity figure leaves open. The guideline warns of the risk of co-eluting impurities, and it lists counter-ion content and water content as tests separate from purity.5 The guide on what 99% purity means takes this further, and the certificate of analysis guide shows where each result appears. Batch documents, when they exist, are published on the Lab Results page.

Human evidence

None applies. This guide is about how peptides are made, and none of its sources is a study of what a peptide does in people or in animals. Nothing here bears on the effects or the safety of any compound.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a deletion sequence and a truncated sequence?

A deletion sequence has one or more amino acids missing because a coupling or deprotection was incomplete; a truncated sequence is a chain that was capped by acetylation and stopped growing.5

Can a mass spectrum show that a residue has racemized?

Not on its own, because an epimer has the same atoms as the target and so the same mass. The EMA guideline describes chiral gas chromatography after acid hydrolysis as a method often used to identify and measure the mirror-image forms of the amino acids.5

Why do some certificates mention trifluoroacetate?

Review Trifluoroacetic acid is used to cleave the peptide from the resin, and trifluoroacetate can remain as a counter-ion from the synthesis or from purification.14 The EMA lists residual trifluoroacetate among the specification tests for a peptide active substance.5

Is every peptide made by solid-phase synthesis?

No. The EMA guideline also covers synthesis in solution and fragment condensation, and it excludes products made by recombinant technology, which is a different route.5

References

Every record links to its PubMed entry or its source. The label under each one names the kind of work it is.

  1. D'Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, et al. Related impurities in peptide medicines. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014.

    ReviewReview of peptide-related impurities in peptide drug substances and products

    PubMed 25044089 (opens in a new tab)abcdefgh

  2. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, published by Nobel Prize Outreach. Press release: The 1984 Nobel Prize in Chemistry (R. Bruce Merrifield, for his development of methodology for chemical synthesis on a solid matrix), 17 October 1984. Accessed 8 October 2026.

    Source

    nobelprize.org (opens in a new tab)abcdefghijk

  3. Chang CD, Meienhofer J. Solid-phase peptide synthesis using mild base cleavage of N alpha-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonylamino acids, exemplified by a synthesis of dihydrosomatostatin. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1978.

    Chemistry studyPrimary synthesis paper: Fmoc amino acids used on a solid support, shown with a synthesis of dihydrosomatostatin

    PubMed 649259 (opens in a new tab)abcdef

  4. King DS, Fields CG, Fields GB. A cleavage method which minimizes side reactions following Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1990.

    Chemistry studyBench comparison of scavenger mixtures for trifluoroacetic acid cleavage, tested on ten peptides of 20 to 50 residues

    PubMed 2279849 (opens in a new tab)abcdef

  5. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the Development and Manufacture of Synthetic Peptides (EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/367182/2025; dated 4 December 2025, in effect 1 June 2026). Accessed 8 October 2026.

    Source

    ema.europa.eu (opens in a new tab)abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefgh

  6. Paradís-Bas M, Tulla-Puche J, Albericio F. The road to the synthesis of "difficult peptides". Chem Soc Rev. 2016.

    ReviewReview of strategies for synthesizing aggregation-prone ("difficult") peptides

    PubMed 26612670 (opens in a new tab)ab

  7. Fields GB, Noble RL. Solid phase peptide synthesis utilizing 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1990.

    ReviewReview of Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis methodology

    PubMed 2191922 (opens in a new tab)↑

  8. Behrendt R, White P, Offer J. Advances in Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis. J Pept Sci. 2016.

    ReviewReview of advances in Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis; two of the three authors were at Novabiochem (Merck)

    PubMed 26785684 (opens in a new tab)↑

  9. Shelton PT, Jensen KJ. Linkers, resins, and general procedures for solid-phase peptide synthesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2013.

    ReviewMethods chapter: overview of resins and linkers and standard Fmoc protocols (not a primary study)

    PubMed 23943476 (opens in a new tab)ab

  10. Subirós-Funosas R, Prohens R, Barbas R, et al. Oxyma: an efficient additive for peptide synthesis to replace the benzotriazole-based HOBt and HOAt with a lower risk of explosion. Chemistry. 2009.

    Chemistry studyBench study of the coupling additive Oxyma in carbodiimide-mediated peptide bond formation, with calorimetry

    PubMed 19575348 (opens in a new tab)↑

  11. Mant CT, Chen Y, Yan Z, et al. HPLC analysis and purification of peptides. Methods Mol Biol. 2007.

    ReviewMethods review of HPLC modes for peptide analysis and purification

    PubMed 18604941 (opens in a new tab)↑

  12. Wang J, Berglund MR, Braden T, et al. Mechanistic Study of Diketopiperazine Formation during Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis of Tirzepatide. ACS Omega. 2022.

    Chemistry studyMechanistic and kinetic study of diketopiperazine formation during solid-phase synthesis of tirzepatide (Eli Lilly)

    PubMed 36570276 (opens in a new tab)abcdef

  13. Palasek SA, Cox ZJ, Collins JM. Limiting racemization and aspartimide formation in microwave-enhanced Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis. J Pept Sci. 2007.

    Chemistry studyMicrowave-assisted Fmoc synthesis of a model 20-residue peptide containing all twenty natural amino acids (CEM Corporation)

    PubMed 17121420 (opens in a new tab)abc

  14. Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, Braet S, et al. Quality evaluation of synthetic quorum sensing peptides used in R&D. J Pharm Anal. 2015.

    Chemistry studyIn-house quality control of quorum-sensing peptides supplied for research with a requested purity of at least 95%

    PubMed 29403929 (opens in a new tab)abc

  15. Duengo S, Muhajir MI, Hidayat AT, et al. Epimerisation in Peptide Synthesis. Molecules. 2023.

    ReviewReview of epimerization during peptide synthesis

    PubMed 38138507 (opens in a new tab)↑

  16. Isidro-Llobet A, Kenworthy MN, Mukherjee S, et al. Sustainability Challenges in Peptide Synthesis and Purification: From R&D to Production. J Org Chem. 2019.

    ReviewPerspective from the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable on peptide synthesis and purification

    PubMed 30900880 (opens in a new tab)↑

Written by Horizon Peptides editorial. Checked against its sources on .